WW2010
University of Illinois

WW2010
 
welcome
 
online guides
 
archives
 
educational cd-rom
 
current weather
 
about ww2010
 
index

Online Guides
 
introduction
 
meteorology
 
remote sensing
 
reading maps
 
projects, activities

Remote Sensing
 
introduction
 
radars
 
satellites

Satellites
 
introduction
 
goes satellites
 
poes satellites
 
image interpretation

Image Interpretation
 
visible (vis)
 
infrared (ir)
 
vis -vs- ir
 
color enhanced ir
 
water vapor (wv)
 
vis -vs- ir -vs- wv

User Interface
 
graphics
text

.
Visible -vs- Infrared -vs- Water Vapor
reflectivity -vs- temperature -vs- moisture

Images (a), (b) and (c) are examples of visible and infrared and water vapor satellite images respectively (valid for the same time).

[Image: miniature visible satellite image (42K)]
(a)
 The visible image depicts clouds stretching from the Gulf of Mexico northeastward into Canada.
[Image: miniature infrared satellite image (40K)]
(b)
 The clouds over Louisiana, Mississippi, and western Tennessee appear gray in the infrared image because of their low and relatively warm cloud tops. The warmer the cloud top temperature, the darker the color.
[Image: miniature water vapor image (42K)]
(c)
 These clouds are associated with a large area of moist air covering most of the eastern third of the United States visible in the water vapor image as the extensive area of white.

The thunderstorms (areas of bright white) that broke out from Mississippi to South Carolina stand out more vividly in the infrared and water vapor images than in the visible. Drier air filtering in behind the thunderstorms across Illinois, Indiana and Missouri stands out very well in the water vapor image (c), however is not as noticeable in the infrared (b) and visible (a) images.


water vapor (wv)
Terms for using data resources. CD-ROM available.
Credits and Acknowledgments for WW2010.
Department of Atmospheric Sciences (DAS) at
the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign.

Reading Maps